The primary reason for this is because in Mixed Mode, in order for light to interact with Non-Sequential Components, it must be converted to non-sequential rays. With respect to your question about modeling this type of beam using Mixed Mode, I would not expect this to yeild the same results as Physical Optics Propagation (POP). Take a look in the OpticStudio Help Files under 'The Analyze Tab (sequential ui mode) > Laser and Fibers Group > About Physical Optics Propagation > Defining the Initial Beam > Multimode' for a description of what the above parameters mean. ! Sample for defining donut mode by incoherent sum of TEM 01 and TEM 10 ! command weight param1 param2 param3 param4 param5 param6 param7 param8 I've also attached a quick sample file using this file. There's a sample donut beam file in file '\Documents\Zemax\POP\BEAMFILES,' and it's defined below. If you use the Zemax models provided here, we would appreciate it if you could cite this paper as well as the figshare fileset.You should be able to do this by taking the incoherent sum of a TEM01 and TEM10 beam via the Multimode Beam Type in the Physical Optics Propagation Beam Definition. This paper provides a detailed description of how these Zemax models were produced and analyzed. Kurvits, Mingming Jiang, and Rashid Zia has been published in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A.
ANCHOR OPTICS ZEMAX FILE UPDATE
Update (, Description only): The related paper on “Comparative analysis of imaging configurations and objectives for Fourier microscopy” by Jonathan A.
![anchor optics zemax file anchor optics zemax file](https://support.zemax.com/hc/article_attachments/1500007649861/Catalog_drop-down_menu.jpg)
In all cases, this required a shift in the position of the Bertrand Lens of ~1cm further from the tube lens. Specifically, the position of the Bertrand Lens has been modified so that it correctly images the BFP image onto the real image plane. Additionally, for all multiconfiguration files, the "before image plane" configuration has been modified. Update (, Version 2, filenames annotated with "_v2" suffix): For all objectives files and the objective catalog, the immersion oil layer semi-diameter has been changed to float so as to prevent unrealistic vignetting that may otherwise occur. Patent # 7,889,433 assignee: Nikon objective description: 60x, 1.25 water immersion. Patent # 7,046,451 assignee: Nikon objective description: 100x, 1.5 NA TIRF (modeled as 1.49 NA to match possible commercial realization).Ĩ) U.S. Patent # 7,046,451 assignee: Nikon objective description: 60x, 1.5 NA TIRF (modeled as 1.49 NA to match possible commercial realization).ħ) U.S. Patent # 6,519,092 assignee: Nikon objective description: 100x, 1.4 NA Plan Apo.Ħ) U.S.
![anchor optics zemax file anchor optics zemax file](https://www.edmundoptics.com/contentassets/4ac79565d5e64d789b2cfed5b34f428e/preferred-glass.jpg)
Patent # 6,519,092 assignee: Nikon objective description: 60x, 1.4 NA Plan Apo.ĥ) U.S.
![anchor optics zemax file anchor optics zemax file](https://www.edmundoptics.com/contentassets/0fdde67f0d3e477eac2464bf2ad6df34/fig-1-5td.jpg)
Patent # 6,504,563 assignee: Zeiss objective description: 100x, 1.45 NA TIRF.Ĥ) U.S. Patent # 5,659,425 assignee: Olympus objective description: 100x, 1.65 NA Apo.ģ) U.S. Patent # 5,517,360 assignee: Olympus objective description: 60x, 1.4 NA Plan Apo.Ģ) U.S. Specifically, it includes multi-configuration Zemax files that allow for the comparison of different Fourier microscopy imaging configurations as well as Zemax lens files and lens catalogs for microscope objectives and tube lenses, as inferred from the following published patents:ġ) U.S. This fileset contains Zemax files related to the manuscript entitled “Comparative analysis of imaging configurations and objectives for Fourier microscopy” by Jonathan A.